When actively managed funds are worth it

0


It’s hard to beat the market and the index funds that follow them.

The numbers don’t lie: Only a quarter of all actively managed funds in the United States have surpassed the average of their index fund counterparts in the 10-year period that ended in June, according to the latest report from the Morningstar active / passive barometer.

But in some pockets of the market, active managers are more successful in beating their benchmarks. Studies show that active funds that invest in small and medium-sized companies, foreign stocks and medium-term bonds, for example, have been more successful in beating their benchmarks than funds in other market segments, according to Morningstar. .

“Sectors of the market that are less selected are richer in targets for active fund managers,” says Ben Johnson, director of global ETF research at Morningstar. Why this? “There are fewer opportunities if you come up with the 12 millionth investment thesis for Apple.”

Indeed, it can be difficult for active managers to differentiate themselves in high traffic market segments, such as stocks of large companies. Most of these companies are followed as closely as your favorite sports team or your Netflix TV series. More than 50 analysts follow every move from Amazon.com (AMZN), for example. This partly explains why only 17% of all large US company funds topped the S&P 500 in the 10-year period ending in June, according to data from the S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Attached is a guide to where it pays to be active and some funds to consider.

The best portfolios will use index funds for heavily trampled parts of the market and put active funds at the service of asset classes in which an active manager has a better chance of beating the index. “A mix of the two is a good way forward,” says Steve Azoury, Chartered Financial Consultant and Founder of Azoury Financial. (Unless otherwise noted, returns and data are through November 5.)

Find stocks that fly under the radar

In general, the smaller the company, the less likely it is to be tracked by the Wall Street research machine.

“It’s almost like scuba diving,” says Morningstar’s Johnson. The lower the market value of the business, “the more cloudy it becomes and the fewer predators there are.”

It’s a good environment for active fund managers. This increases the chances of a manager identifying a good opportunity before their rivals, says Craigh Cepukenas, comanager of Small artisanal capitalization (ARTSX, expense ratio 1.21%) and Artisan Mid Cap (ARTMX, 1.18%) funds. The strategy of both funds is to find disruptive companies that drive change, and then hold onto them even after they grow into larger companies. “We let our winners run,” says Cepukenas.

Artisan funds also favor discreet companies. Only six Wall Street analysts cover Valmont Industries (VMI), for example. The maker of metal products, such as poles used for traffic lights, is among the top 20 for Artisan Small Cap. Some of the fund’s other low-profile holdings, such as digital health firm OptimizeRx (OPRX) and Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS), a water management company, have even fewer analysts following them.

The primary purpose of active funds is to exploit what Wall Street calls market “inefficiencies”, which occur when market prices of securities fluctuate from their actual fair value, says Brian Price, head of investment management for Commonwealth Financial Network.

This is what makes active midsize equity funds attractive: midsize companies often fall through the cracks. They “lack the enthusiasm of small businesses and the notoriety of the big names,” explains Cepukenas d’Artisan.

In particular, actively managed funds that focus on fast-growing mid-size US companies tend to shine the most relative to their index fund rivals. Algiers Mid Cap Growth (AMGAX, 1.30%) ranks among these best indexes. It has outperformed its benchmark, the Russell Mid Cap Growth Index, and its category peers in the last one, three, five and 10 year periods. The fund typically charges a charge of 5.25%, but you can buy stocks free of charge from Fidelity and Charles Schwab.

Look abroad for international stocks

International stock pickers have an advantage over their benchmarks in part because they have “boots on the ground” in the countries where they invest, says Dan Genter, CEO and CIO of RNC Genter Capital Management. This allows them to better understand the drivers of local economies and to find companies with growth potential before the competition.

The managers of Wasatch Emerging Markets Selection (WAESX, 1.51%) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap (WAEMX, 1.95%), for example, isn’t afraid to look beyond its benchmarks in foreign stocks for undiscovered opportunities.

When managers travel abroad, local brokers who help them organize company meetings often say, “No one ever visits this company. Why do you care? says Ajay Krishnan, co-manager of the two funds. But this is precisely the draw. The two Wasatch funds have outperformed their benchmarks over the past one, three and five years.

Among foreign equity funds, those that favor bargain-priced stocks tend to fare the best compared to their index fund counterparts, according to Morningstar.

Some high value foreign funds to consider include International pavement value (CIVVX, 1.10%), a fund that focuses on good companies going through difficult times. Oakmark International (OAKIX, 1.04%) is a Morningstar Gold-rated fund that searches for stocks that trade 30% below their market value using what Morningstar analyst Andrew Daniels calls “sleuth at the edge.” Ancient “.

Be demanding with obligations

Active bond fund managers can be more nimble than their index fund counterparts – by eliminating or avoiding low-quality issues that could be important parts of many bond indices or by giving more weight to the more opportunistic segments of the market. .

The Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, for example, currently has a large weight (45.1%) in US Treasuries, but a smaller portion of higher yielding bonds, such as asset-backed securities. mortgages and debt issued by companies. In recent years, any mid-term bond fund manager willing to shift their portfolio towards higher yielding bond sectors, such as corporate debt rated triple B or below, or asset-backed securities with higher yields. higher yields, could improve their chances of overtaking the Agg, says Price of the Commonwealth Financial Network.

This is partly why Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND, 0.36%) has outperformed the Agg index in the past one, three and five years. The fund currently holds more than 10% of its assets in high yield debt (double B to triple C rating), which has helped boost returns; in contrast, the Agg does not hold any high yield debt.

Baird’s Global Obligation (BAGSX, 0.55%) remains in investment grade territory (debt rated triple A to triple B) but has recently gained an advantage by taking on more corporate debt than Agg, particularly in financial. The fund has beaten the index in the past one, three and five years.


Share.

Comments are closed.